Enriched Iranium

I received an email update from The Clarion Fund with a link to a short video demonstrating the nuclear threat Iran and radical Islam poses to the U.S. 

"For over 3 decades, Iran has been exporting hatred and terrorism against the West. Now they are on the brink of attaining nuclear weapons. Please watch and share this short film." -- The Clarion Fund

Check it out:

Enriched Iranium

75% of religious persecution today targets Christians

I received an email for the ACLJ promoting an event called 48 Hours for Religious Freedom to support Pastor Yusef Nadarkhani in Iran.  In the email. they present the following facts:

"Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani was told to deny Christ or be sentenced to death. He replied, "I cannot."
Tragically, 75% of religious persecution today targets Christians, and Iran is one of the world's worst offenders. It is illegal to even own a Bible or worship in Iran's native language.

"Across the globe, Christians are being arrested, persecuted, intimidated, and killed for their faith – and reports are escalating."

I wrote about Christian persecution on 7/3/2011.  Remember that around the world, a Christian is killed by a non-christian every 5 minutes.  This is not news M3 will report.  For the most part, M3 are anti-Christian and anti-God. 

God, Jerusalem and American Foreign Policy

This article, God, Jerusalem and American Foreign Policy, by Caroline Glick, is very informative on the BHO administration's attempt to appear to support Israel.  Its also insightful into the fickle American public's view on foreign policy.

It is obvious that the Demoncrats realized that the absence of God in their official party platform and not taking a stance to support Israel was going to be detrimental to them in a close race.  So they thought they could change the wording of their platform and give word service to two issues that the mainstream majority of Americans felt strongly about.  What they did not count on was the opposition they would encounter from their own radical base.  The delegates actually booed God at the convention!

BHO's administration has caught heat over this last year because his State Dept. refuses to declare Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.  Now that the Demoncrats have officially  declared Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, I call on BHO to move our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.  Michael Brown's article Oh Jerusalem, Jerusalem points out that the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, passed by both houses of Congress, calls for moving the embassy there, but the act allows for 6 month Presidential waivers and every President has passed a waiver.

The lip service needs to end.  The U.S. embassy should be moved to Jerusalem expeditiously.
_______________
God, Jerusalem and American Foreign Policy

Here are some great articles I found that summarize the Demoncrat convention and expound on the topic of the Demoncrats booing God.  And you wondered whey they were called Demoncrats?

Satan Finally Found His Political Party—The Democrats! by Doug Giles

The DNC As I Saw It by Derek Hunter

What Obama Meant to Say in His DNC Speech by Rachel Alexander -

Read this & imagine BHO’s voice.  Hilarious!!!

Act on God, Jerusalem a Disaster for Dems by Bob Beauprez

Green on Blue Shootings Probe

A probe on insider attacks, also known as Green on Blue Shootings, has resulted in hundreds of Afghan National Army soldiers being removed.

"So far this year, 45 international service members, most of them Americans, have died at the hands of Afghan soldiers or policemen or insurgents wearing their uniforms. There were at least 12 such attacks in August alone, resulting in 15 deaths."

"Coalition authorities have said about 25 percent of this year's insider attacks had confirmed or suspected links to the Taliban."

"Earlier this year, the U.S. commanders assigned some troops to be "guardian angels" who watch over their comrades in interactions with Afghan forces and even as they sleep. The U.S. also started allowing Americans to carry weapons in several Afghan ministries and made security more of a consideration in evaluating visits to Afghan government offices. U.S. officials also recently ordered American troops to carry loaded weapons at all times in Afghanistan, even when they are on their bases."
______________
The article can be found at:  Afghan soldiers fired during insider attacks probe

African Coalition Doing What U.S. Should Have in Somalia

Until I read this article I had no idea that an African coalition of Kenyans, Burundians, Ethopians, Djiboutis, Ugandans, and anti-al-Shabab (but Muslim) Somalis were attacking al-Shabab in Somalia, has driven them from Mogadishu, and is about to take their seaport of Kismay.  This coalition has been working for about a year to rid the region of al-Shabab, but that amazing news is nowhere to be found in the U.S. media.  Thank M3 for keeping this quiet.  This definitely is not news they should promote or share.  We really shouldn't know that al-Shabab, the terrorist affiliate of al Queda in Somalia which caused the "Blackhawk Down" incident is finally being dealt with.

__________________
The story can be found at:Al-Qaida's East African Targets Shoot Back

Intolerance in the Gravest Extreme

 Here is a great little story exposing the truth about Islam's intolerance of criticism.  Everyone knows this, but few will vocalize it.  Christianity is fair game for criticism because the critics have nothing to fear from Christians.  But critics of Islam have to fear for their lives as the practitioners of the "Religion of Peace" will not tolerate any criticism.
__________________
The following story can be found at:  The Untold Story of Islam

Author Tom Holland shook the Islamic world early this year with his book In the Shadow of the Sword. Now, he has taken his book and turned it onto a documentary of sorts called Islam: The Untold Story. Holland has the temerity to question whether Islam is legitimate based on textual criticism of its own book, the Koran.

To begin with, Holland compared the surviving documentary evidence of the birth of Islam with the actual text of the Koran and found several discrepancies. This is actually nothing new. Scholars have been finding supposed contradictions between the biblical text and documentary evidence for centuries. But Holland does not necessarily have an axe to grind with Islam. He is not, as many liberal scholars are intending to do with the Bible, trying to disprove the Koranic text; he is simply asking questions and trying to get down to the heart of the matter.
However, Islamic scholars who actually believe the Koran is reliable completely discount anything Holland has to say. When Holland asks a professor of Islamic Studies at George Washington University if a non-Muslim can understand the origins of the Muslim world, the simple reply is “no.” Holland’s own admitted non-attachment to the Islamic religion immediately disqualifies him from being able to answer the basic questions he is asking. Like a private club, Muslim scholars have little time or patience for interlopers like Holland. Their minds are made up already.
But would it even matter if Holland was a Muslim himself? The answer seems to be self-evident. If they are unwilling to listen to an outsider, or even acknowledge that his research is worth looking into, why should they accept the findings of a “heretic” inside the camp? Anyone, whether from within or without, who dares to question the legitimacy of the Koran, will be treated as an outsider and therefore, easily dismissed as unqualified. The system is closed. Denying or even questioning the Koran is grounds for being disregarded and ignored. A British reviewer of the documentary had this to say:

Herein lay another parallel story that was seldom far from the surface but which remained steadfastly untold. For decades – centuries even – scholars have felt free to contest the accuracy of other religious texts. Not least the Bible; what’s true, what’s parable and what’s just wishful thinking has all been up for grabs without any serious damage being done to Christian beliefs. Not so with Islam, around which non-Islamic scholars tread with extreme caution. I’m all for cultural and religious sensitivity, but the degree to which Holland tiptoed around the subject and apologised for his findings went way beyond what was required. Or would have been on offer for any other religion. It was almost as if he was looking over his shoulder, half expecting a fatwa at any minute.

And this is the real story with Islam. No one—researcher, journalist, or seeker—doubts that Muslims take their religion seriously, very seriously. So seriously, in fact, that apologies are often the first and last thing offered any time someone has the guts to ask questions about the religion—where it came from, who Muhammad was, what he did, etc. Scholars can feel free to rip the Bible to shreds and still sleep comfortably at night, but this is not the case with Islam. Anyone, even author/historians, must constantly reassure Muslims that they are not implying anything “true” when they question the Islamic religion, or its founder, or its truth claims because there is always a spirit of fear associated with Islam. And this is precisely why the professor at GWU was quite forthcoming in his answer: Anyone is free to investigate the origins of Islam, just don’t expect to be taken as being credible. The only “true” Islamic scholar is the one who says the Koran is correct in all it teaches. The Koran is true because the Koran is true; if it was good enough for Muhammad, it’s good enough for modern Muslims.