Just in time for his Lame Duckness to become even lamer than previously thought, a new poll shows that Obama has wrapped up a solid three-quarters of the all-important Muslim on the street vote.
“Seventy-two percent of U.S. Muslims approved of the job President Barack Obama was doing as president during the first six months of 2014,” says Gallup, “higher than any other U.S. religious group Gallup tracks.”
So there’s that.
If you’re Muslim, what’s not to like?
Oil prices are keeping the petrodollars rolling into a multitude of mostly Muslim but uniformly corrupt states not starting with “United” that use the money to export both religion and a reign of terror; Israel is being attacked, this time by the expansion of militants’ ability to send missiles farther into Israel than previously able to; Al Qaeda is threatening to spread Islamic governance, under the imprimatur of bin Laden; and where Al Qaeda isn’t in control, Iran is.
All you really need to know is that what the rest of us consider a foreign policy disaster has only shaved off the margin of error from Obama’s popularity with Muslims in America.
They think that Missiles over the MidEast is great!
Beheadings? Hurrah!
Dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria?
Yep.
According to Gallup Obama’s popularity with Muslims is just five percentage points below his average of 77 percent that he enjoyed from 2009 to 2014.
There is no stopping the Democrat juggernaut-drive-by-policy wreck.
Former President Jimmy Carter sharply criticized President Obama for his handling of foreign policy yesterday, saying it’s often “hard to figure out what his policy is.”
In an interview with the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, the nation’s 39th president accused Obama of violating the U.S. Constitution with drone strikes that killed Americans.
On the current threat of ISIS, Carter wasn’t any kinder to Obama. “First of all, we waited too long,” he said. “We let the Islamic State build up its money, capability and strength and weapons while it was still in Syria.”
Last month, the former Nobel Peace Prize winner came out in favor of attacking the Islamic State.
While trepidatious world leaders (those without cojones) continue to hyperventilate over Palestinian causalities–thousands of Christians from the Middle East to Africa are being tortured, raped and beheaded by Koran-toting, Islamo-thugs.
(Yes, civilians in Gaza are being killed–but that’s due to Hamas’ craven tactic of hiding behind women and children. …So, to all you anti-Semitic jackasses out there–get over it.)
Leaders such as Barack Obama, David Cameron and Ban Ki-Moon have remained chillingly reticent while groups such as ISIS and Boko Haram engage in a systematic genocide to eradicate Christians.
A genocide, by the way–that’s so brutal even infants are being decapitated in droves.
For the first time in over 2,000 years the city of Mosul, Iraq is now Christian-free thanks to the insidious efforts of ISIS. This group–built on the blood-thirsty paradigm set by the Prophet Mohammed–issued the following edict to all Christians: “convert, pay the jizya, or die.”
The term jizya (for those not familiar with it) is an onerous tax that all non-Muslims must pay when forced to live under Sharia law. But, more than money–it’s about violating and subjugating those Islam deems “pigs” and “infidels.” In other words–those that are considered subhuman scum according to Koranic doctrine.
In a recent report issued by Barnabasfund.org–Boko Haram has driven over 95% of the Christian population from Yobe, Nigeria. The group has engaged in a terror campaign of rape and arson (church burnings) in order to drive the “people of the book” from the once thriving city.
Of course, the carnage isn’t limited to Iraq and Nigeria. Christians are being persecuted in Mali, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt and the Ivory Coast.
(And that’s just a partial list.)
And yet–despite the bloodshed–the likes of Obama, Cameron and Ki-Moon say nothing.
That’s right: Nothing!
Well, that’s not totally true. They do say something, and they say it ad nauseam: “Islam is a religion of peace.”
Sadly, my friends–all of this is part of the New World Order where cowardly leaders (mired in the fever swamps of political correctness) turn a blind eye to the evils being perpetrated by Mohammed’s minions.
And– as a result–we will all suffer Death by Islam.
I believe our nation is in a great deal of trouble; in fact, I don’t think I’m going too far in saying that we are on the precipice of once again, repeating history . Not only can you compare America’s current state of affairs to the fall of Rome, I believe we are on the verge of yet another government sponsored genocide in our nation. Though, the correct term for the government sponsored murder of its own citizens is democide.
Governments are actually responsible for the senseless deaths of millions upon millions of people. In fact, governments, in time of peace, have murdered more people than the combined deaths of all of mans wars in history. This is especially true of the twentieth century with the rise of communism. Over one hundred million people were brutally murdered by communist regimes in search of Utopia between 1900 and 2000. From Lenin and Stalin to Mao Tse Tsung, to Pol Pot in Cambodia and the Brutal Regime of North Korea, the quest to create a perfect society where people accept total state domination has been nothing but bloody.
The reason for this is simple. Communism is a system that demands total and complete obedience to the state and anyone who opposes that is standing in the way of progress and needs to be eliminated. Bringing society to the point where they will willingly participate in the slaughter of their own countrymen is not an overnight process. It is a gradual conditioning of the population to get them to believe that some people are not as worthy of life as others.
I believe that here in the United States we are witnessing this gradual process unfold before our very eyes. Gregory H. Stanton has identified an eight-stage process that generally occurs in the conditioning of a people to prepare them for genocide. In this article I intend to give a brief analysis of each of the eight steps (if applicable because we have not completed all of them) and how they apply to the situation we currently face in the United States.
I am not pro-war. In and of itself, war makes no sense. Masses of people killing other masses of people can never be constructive. It is always destructive: of property, of people, of civilized society. There is only one time when war is justifiable: when it is in defense of civilization, when it is waged against aggression. What is happening today in the Middle East can lead to only one conclusion: It is that organizations such as Hamas, Hezbolah, Isis and Al Qaeda are aggressors against civilization. Thus, they are evil because they do not make war to protect or establish civilized society, but to promote a cruel and dictatorial society based on a religion which is itself a false and defective invention.
It is not merely an opinion that Islam is an evil. It is provable. When brutal savage men can claim as an unwilling bride, some little girl of seven, then rape and subjugate her to a life without freedom, the religion in whose name this is done cannot be considered valid by any standards of decency and intelligence. Muslims have proven over and over that following Islam strictly, fundamentally, encourages uncivilized conduct and brutality with the excuse that cruel and inhumane actions are done at the word of God.
I don't really want to have to qualify this because the images of cruelty have taken Islam way beyond sane defense, but I suppose I must say that there are many Muslims in the world who are peaceable and do not wish to promote genocide and the complete destruction of civilization. I know such people and have befriended them. But those Muslims are not following the word of the Quran strictly. They are not orthodox, but reform Muslims, who want civilization to proceed apace. They do not favor beheading women and children or innocent men.
Except for a brave and slowly growing few, they have been largely silent, perhaps out of fear of reprisal. Nonetheless, if they are not going to speak up against these disgustingly backward animals, they are complicit in the acts of brutality and at the very least we must now ignore any protest from them. If they choose not to distinguish themselves from the pernicious horror that Islam has proven to be, they risk collective identity with militant orthodoxy, at least until they admit its existence and object to it.
It is apparent from decades of experience with fundamentalist Muslims, whom we now call Islamists, that there is no making peace with them, there is no curative negotiation, no chance of coexistence. The only thing these people understand is conquest. Once conquered, they will comply with the rules imposed on them, by the conqueror.
The absurd idea that we can remake a deeply ingrained theocracy which allows no opposition, no free-will, nothing but obedience to its dictatorial rules, into a freely democratic, civilized society, could only be the notion of an idiot, with the philosophic perception of an elementary school child. When generation after generation has been subjected to the imbecility of nomadic savagery, there is no hope but to treat them in a way they understand: namely to force them to be civilized, to give them rules to which they must be obedient, in this case, our rules.
How do we do this? First, we should—indeed we must—allow the only demonstrably courageous army, currently willing to do the job, actually do the job! We should cheer the Israelis on and, if necessary, lend them the money and arms to obliterate first Hamas, then ISIS, then all the other so-called armies of savages who threaten civilization. Indeed, we must encourage the Europeans to do the same in Europe and we ourselves should stamp out all threats from such savages wherever we find them. Western civilization, as well as that of Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere on the globe is being destroyed from within and Obama is helping to destroy it by his commiseration with Islam. We must recognize the biblical edict with one change: Those who live by the sword must die by the sword.
Muslims in Iraq, all members of ISIS, are beheading Christian children, raping and butchering their mothers, and hanging their fathers. Mark Arabo, a Chaldean-American leader, had this to say:
They are systematically beheading children”He did an interview explaining this horror:
The Islamic State has warned the United States that it plans to attack America and raise “the flag of Allah in the White House.”
“I say to America that the Islamic caliphate has been established,” Abu Mosa, a spokesman for the terror group, also known as ISIS, told Vice Media in a video interview posted online Thursday. “Don’t be cowards and attack us with drones. Instead send your soldiers, the ones we humiliated in Iraq. We will humiliate them everywhere, God willing, and we will raise the flag of Allah in the White House.”
A Christian Filipino Nurse was abducted and gang raped by a group of Muslim men in the capital city of Libya on Wednesday.
The IBTimes reports:
The woman was seized outside her residence on Wednesday and taken to an unknown location, where she was sexually abused by up to six men, the Philippines' Foreign Affairs spokesman Charles Jose told reporters.
She was released about two hours later and taken to hospital for treatment.
The incident took place only a few days after a Filipino construction worker was beheaded, amid allegations he was killed for not being a Muslim.
Target must have some sort of death wish. What kind of idiot do you have to be to publicly announce to the world that you won’t allow any gun-owners to frequent your business, knowing that armed criminals target gun-free zones because of the plethora of defenseless and helpless people?
A businessman who has a vested interest in making sure his company locations are safe from armed robberies and shootings should have enough common sense to know that you don’t announce something like that or put stupid “gun-free zone” signs up at the entrances. All you’re doing is asking for trouble.
These same business people wouldn’t dare put anything like that at their own house, would they? Of course not, because they don’t want to invite armed break-ins. They wouldn’t want to advertise that they have no way to defend themselves. That would be really foolish. But for some reason, they’d make such policies for their business.
Once again demonstrating the level of ignorance that is prevalent in liberal corporate settings, the software company has decided to expand their ban on firearm-related content. Breitbart reported:
According to Google Support's "Dangerous Products or Services" page, the company "[wants] to keep people safe both online and offline, so [they] won't allow the promotion of some products or services that cause damage, harm, or injury."Right. Google (ya know, the company that tracks your every move online) is trying to keep us safe. God bless those left coast liberals who are suddenly embracing the manipulative power of big business. Of course Google seems woefully ignorant of the fact that such “dangerous” items, actually keep many people safe every day. . I understand it could be chalked up to a difference in corporate culture, but I would encourage Google to promote safety and concealed carry classes if they are serious about keeping people safe offline.
The tech giant also decided that such a ban would be ineffective if utilized exclusively against firearms… Which is why they have embraced the idea of expanding their policy to include accessories, ammunition, magazines, clips, scopes, attachments, slings, et al.
Also included is a ban on ads for "any part or component that's necessary to the function of a gun or intended for attachment to a gun." This covers "gun scopes, ammunition, ammunition clips or belts."Whew… I know I feel safer, don’t you? I mean, clearly the lack of advertising on firearm-related accessories will cut down on all those Chicago drive bys. Right? Apparently, this is the culture of California Leftists and liberal corporatism… Guns are bad. The only use for a firearm is to promote inexplicable violence and oppression. Those who own, handle, or carry firearms are merely psychopaths waiting for an excuse to unleash a wave of bloody violence at unsuspecting victims…
Well, unless we’re talking about cops, or Bloomberg’s body guards. Those guys are obviously special. The rest of you commoners, however, aren’t responsible enough to be exposed to an advertisement for a hunting scope from Cabela’s while surfing the interwebs.
So, what’s the solution? Boycott Google?...
And yet, Google manages to be that neighbor who has every tool you ever need – while still being the most obnoxious human being in the cul-de-sac. He might have that reverse-thread bolt, specialty vice grips, or that silly tool used to remove oil filters… but you just can’t quite get past his Obama bumper sticker and inappropriate political jokes about John Boehner (actually, some of those are kinda funny). So the question is, how much do you really need what Google has to offer?
Google has declared a war on gun owners, the firearm industry, and related self-defense products. Because, obviously, a defenseless population will be much safer, right? Bing, on the other hand, has no such restrictions. So, go ahead… Bing away. But don’t expect to cut Google out of your life completely.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to go add the text of the Second Amendment to my automated signature in Gmail.
Another moderate Muslim leader until … he wasn’t. “A well-integrated member of society” who “never ever” showed any radical tendencies until …… he did.
Abdul Rakib Amin — who is seen in a jihadist video — grew up in northeast Scotland, where he volunteered as a prayer caller
What should be catching the ire of both men is the fact that walking next to Hillary in Mattera’s video was a woman who has irrefutable, extensive and very dangerous familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. To boot, Abedin began working for Hillary when the latter was first lady in 1996 and continued to do so during Hillary’s tenure as U.S. Senator, Secretary of State, and now apparently as a 2016 Presidential candidate.
The White House promises that before any money is awarded to anyone, the recipient groups will be “appropriately vetted.” To make sure that only the “moderate” rebels will get the money.
This is supposed to allay fears that money and weapons might end up in the wrong hands. Keep in mind that these are mostly anti-gun politicians calling for sending loads of money, heavy weapons and training to Mohammedan terrorist groups. Isn’t that a little ironic? Foreign terrorists get free money and truly automatic “assault” weapons and rocket-propelled grenades and even crash courses to show them how to use them. But if you’re an American, you have to jump through hoops just to get a permit to own a handgun. After you pay the fee, submit to a background check and wait. Makes perfect sense.
Kidnappings, slavery, the want to exterminate a whole race (the Jews) and cause the end of entire nations (Israel, USA), Sharia law, honor killings, the genocide of people of differing religions (mainly Christians), and this – FGM, Female Genital Mutilation.Islam and Female Genital Mutilation
Yes, all these things can be attributed to the religion of peace, Islam.
The terrible treatment of their own people has been well documented, but the way they treat their women is a tragedy.
Of all the abhorrent things done to Muslim girls/women, Female Genital Mutilation is the worst.
The practice of FGM is so disturbing, I will not describe it here. If you wish to know more, you may link here.
FGM has been common in Africa and the Middle East for quite a long time. Today it is estimated that between 125 million and 150 million women have been mutilated to “honor” Islam.
President Obama has been accused of violating U.S. laws by approving a prisoner exchange of five Guantanamo detainees for the release of America’s only prisoner of war, Republicans claim.
John McCain welcomed the release of soldier Bowe Bergdahl, who was held for five years by Islamic Islamists, but said the men being freed had ‘the blood of Americans on their hands’.
The five Afghans are among the most senior members of the Taliban being held at the controversial camp, and include one who had direct ties to Osama bin Laden.
As well as warning of the potential threat releasing these men could have, other Republicans have accused Obama of breaking the law by sidestepping Congress.
Congressman Howard McKeon and Senator James Inhofe said on Saturday that the President has to give Congress 30 days’ notice before transferring terrorists from U.S. facilities.
Going down gun-control memory lane one recent day, I thought about California Senator Dianne Feinstein talking about her distorted belief on the evils of assault weapons. All the while holding an AK-47 in her hands with her finger wrapped around the trigger; that’s an anti-gun Democrat for you. Silly-liberal-rabbit, guns are for freedom-loving Americans who know how to HOLD a gun! Yes certainly, nothing is more dangerous than a liberal’s finger on the trigger of any gun.
That reminds me, anyone remember another (Land of fruits and nuts) California female politician Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy saying, “Even unloaded guns can kill someone.” What are they smoking out in Cali, I’m laughing out loud again.
Let’s one-up the Feinstein-Sheedy statements by saying that: nothing is more dangerous than an uninformed person entering a voting booth to vote. Dangerous for my family’s future and for that of my country, because in all reality the uninformed voter is holding my world in their hands.
I remember watching some show several years ago, when a group of white, forty-something year old women were asked why they had voted for Bill Clinton — are you ready for the answer? Their reply was because, “he was sexy,” WTH! He always did walk with that bar-room swagger, Maybe these foolish women liked reminiscing about their good ol’ days with the sleaze-bar one night stands. Seriously though, what does “being sexy” have to do with choosing a president for the largest free-country in the universe?
Now to our pitiful present day voters, it is incomprehensible to be able to rationally critique why Obama was voted into the most powerful office in the world, twice. I wonder what those same women’s excuse would be voting for likes of Obama. Maybe they think Barracks’ granny jeans make his butt look sexy. Or maybe his bike riding skills are a turn-on to these type of dim-witted women and their ilk. Whatever the excuse, an enormous segment of our society does not belong in a voting booth.
Voting is an honor which deserves our respect and due diligence. (Due diligence is defined as: appropriate carefulness; the degree of care that a prudent person would exercise, which is a legally relevant standard for establishing liability.)
Voting should be treated as an earned privilege, as when one “earns” a driver’s license. So maybe voters should have to purchase voter liability insurance, as drivers are required to carry auto liability insurance. That’s an awe-inspiring idea, this would enable sane voters to sue liberal voters every time our country goes belly-up or down-the-toilet, whatever end you are observing the catastrophe from. Due-diligent voters would be able to sue for liberal pet-projects, rising government debt, pork barrel spending, funding of global warming cures and debunked green energy projects. Do you think there would be any takers for providing liability insurance to silly liberal voters?…I don’t think so.
Truth to sharia adherents is like a cross to Dracula. Brutal.This is typical of liberals whom proclaim to be tolerant above all else.
